2 min read

QwQ: Tiny Thinking Model That Tops DeepSeek R1 (Open Source)

QwQ: Tiny Thinking Model That Tops DeepSeek R1 (Open Source)
🆕 from Matthew Berman! Discover QwQ 32B, the open-source model that rivals DeepSeek R1 in performance while being small enough to run on your computer!.

Key Takeaways at a Glance

  1. 00:00 QwQ 32B is a powerful, open-source thinking model.
  2. 01:50 Reinforcement learning enhances QwQ's capabilities.
  3. 03:33 QwQ's training includes a hybrid reinforcement learning approach.
  4. 09:01 QwQ's performance benchmarks show competitive results.
  5. 11:35 QwQ's context window and thinking process have limitations.
Watch full video on YouTube. Use this post to help digest and retain key points. Want to watch the video with playable timestamps? View this post on Notable for an interactive experience: watch, bookmark, share, sort, vote, and more.

1. QwQ 32B is a powerful, open-source thinking model.

🥇95 00:00

QwQ 32B by Alibaba offers comparable performance to DeepSeek R1 but is significantly smaller, allowing it to run on personal computers.

  • It has 32 billion parameters compared to DeepSeek's 671 billion.
  • The model is designed for fast inference, achieving 450 tokens per second.
  • Being open-source allows for broader accessibility and experimentation.

2. Reinforcement learning enhances QwQ's capabilities.

🥇92 01:50

QwQ utilizes reinforcement learning with outcome-based rewards to improve its critical thinking and coding abilities.

  • The model was trained using a scaling approach driven by outcome-based rewards.
  • It employs separate verification for math and coding tasks to ensure accuracy.
  • This method allows the model to learn effectively from both correct and incorrect outputs.

3. QwQ's training includes a hybrid reinforcement learning approach.

🥇90 03:33

After initial training focused on math and coding, QwQ incorporates general reinforcement learning for broader capabilities.

  • This hybrid approach enhances instruction following and alignment with human preferences.
  • It maintains performance in specialized tasks while improving general capabilities.
  • The model's design allows for iterative improvements based on feedback.

4. QwQ's performance benchmarks show competitive results.

🥈88 09:01

While QwQ 32B performs well, it has mixed results against other models in specific benchmarks.

  • It scored 78 on the Amy 2024 benchmark, outperforming DeepSeek R1 in some areas.
  • However, it scored lower on the GPT QA Diamond benchmark compared to DeepSeek R1.
  • The model's efficiency is notable given its smaller parameter count.

5. QwQ's context window and thinking process have limitations.

🥈85 11:35

The model's context window is relatively small, which may affect its performance in complex tasks.

  • A 132k context window is on the smaller side compared to current standards.
  • The model tends to engage in extensive thinking, which can consume more tokens.
  • Implementing techniques like chain of thought prompting could optimize its output.
This post is a summary of YouTube video 'QwQ: Tiny Thinking Model That Tops DeepSeek R1 (Open Source)' by Matthew Berman. To create summary for YouTube videos, visit Notable AI.