TESTED & RANKED Gemini GPT-4 and Grok [SEE CORRECTION IN DESCRIPTION. BARD = GEMINI FOR TEXT ONLY ]

1. Gemini GPT-4 and Grok are tested and ranked.

🥈85 00:00

The video analyzes and ranks the performance of Gemini GPT-4 and Grok in various tasks.

• The speaker doubts the examples provided by Google for Gemini GPT-4.
• There are doubts and accusations of fraud regarding the results of Google Gemini.

2. Gemini GPT-4 performs well in writing.

🥈88 00:43

Gemini GPT-4 impresses with its writing ability and performs well in various tasks.

• Gemini GPT-4 demonstrates strong writing skills.
• It performs well in other areas such as music and coding.

3. Vision tasks are challenging for Gemini GPT-4 and Grok.

🥇92 01:31

Both Gemini GPT-4 and Grok struggle with vision tasks, such as counting apples and recognizing landmarks.

• Gemini GPT-4 and Grok have difficulty accurately counting apples in images.
• They also struggle to recognize landmarks, such as the Space Needle and the Taj Mahal.

4. Bard performs well in reasoning tasks.

🥈89 02:37

Bard demonstrates strong reasoning skills and performs well in tasks involving logic and problem-solving.

• Bard is able to solve complex problems using Python code.
• It performs well in tasks such as analyzing images and interpreting speedometer readings.

5. Humor comprehension is a challenge for all models.

🥈86 08:31

All models struggle to understand and explain jokes, indicating limitations in humor comprehension.

• The models fail to understand the punchlines and humor in the jokes provided.
• They struggle to grasp wordplay and puns, leading to inaccurate explanations.

6. Music generation performance varies among models.

🥈82 12:38

Gemini GPT-4 and Grok generate music using ABC notation, with varying results.

• The music generated by Gemini GPT-4 and Grok is evaluated and compared.
• The speaker expresses preference for the music generated by CH and GB models.

7. Models struggle with generating proofs in rhyme.

🥉79 13:24

The models find it challenging to write a proof with rhyming lines.

• The task of writing a proof with rhyming lines is difficult for the models.
• They encounter difficulties in combining logical reasoning with poetic structure.

8. Gemini GPT-4 and Grok are tested and ranked.

🥈85 00:00

Gemini GPT-4 and Grok are compared in terms of their performance in various tasks, including writing, coding, and vision recognition.

• Gemini GPT-4 performs well in writing tasks, showing creativity and engagement.
• Grok struggles in coding tasks and vision recognition, while Gemini GPT-4 excels in these areas.
• GPT-4 outperforms Grok in most tasks, but both models have their strengths and weaknesses.

9. GPT-4 outperforms Gemini and Grok in most tasks.

🥈85 26:06

GPT-4 scored higher than Gemini and Grok in humor, reasoning, and music generation tasks.

• However, GPT-4 struggled with vision-related tasks.
• Gemini and Grok performed impressively well, especially considering Grok's real-time data capabilities.

10. Gemini falls short in vision-related tasks.

🥉78 27:33

Gemini scored significantly lower than GPT-4 in vision-related tasks.

• Gemini's performance in writing and reasoning tasks was comparable to GPT-4.
• However, Gemini's weaknesses in vision and other subtasks are concerning.

11. GPT-4 is more versatile and excels in various tasks.

🥈88 28:02

GPT-4 performed well in writing, reasoning, and coding tasks.

• GPT-4's strengths include quickly scanning information and generating jokes.
• Gemini's performance is close to GPT-4 in some aspects, but falls short in vision and other subtasks.